Monday, 13 August 2012

EHX Civil War Big Muff

Jeremy just mentioned it and as I had the template to hand and it would only take 2 minutes I thought I'd include this one.

I've got another schematic which is identical other than the 430p caps which are shown as 500p, but you're always best experimenting with those anyway on a case by case basis to make sure you're avoiding any fizz.






Posted by at 23:54
Tags: , , ,

47 comments:

  1. superferrite14 August 2012 at 00:07

    Gotta make this. I had one but sold it for insane money on the 'bay. Gilmour, I guess! Build quality was crappy, anyway. The original has the jacks soldered to the board with no support.

    Great fuzz, huge roar with the tone all the way to the left. Stoney!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. mirosol14 August 2012 at 05:24

      Heh. I think that's the way all the russian versions are made... At least my Black russian V8 is.
      +m

      Delete
  2. Unknown14 August 2012 at 01:14

    yay! thanks iviark!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ross14 August 2012 at 01:36

    Gilmour's PULSE era tones are awesome. This might just be next on the list. I need a Big Muff for bass. I'm thinking either this or the Green Russian. Any suggestions?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. mirosol14 August 2012 at 05:23

      Green russian. It has more bass than any other BMP. Seems like my bassist friends all want one..
      +m

      Delete
  4. mirosol15 August 2012 at 21:11

    Yup. No surprises here. Verified.

    Sounds pretty close to V8, but still has some different color to it's tone. Maybe a bit more bassy than black russian, but still much less than green.

    Nice addition to my BMP clone collection. Thanks!
    +m

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IvIark15 August 2012 at 21:27

      Top man. Last time for a while I can tag one as this time tomorrow I'll be pissed in Puerto de Pollensa! :o)

      Delete
    2. mirosol15 August 2012 at 21:39

      I'll try to come up with as much updating as i can :) Have fun in the sun!

      (I'm almost finished with modded 45 phase..)
      +m

      Delete
  5. irondevil18 August 2012 at 08:48

    do i have to choose transistors with a particular hfe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18 August 2012 at 11:40

      I just put any in and it sounds great, unless someone can measure the originals I'd say just experiment.

      Delete
  6. Unknown3 November 2012 at 05:04

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unknown14 November 2012 at 03:31

    I just built this tonight , and it works, but it doesn't have the bite a muff should have. It sounds more like a compressed overdrive or something , but its seriously lacking fuzz. I tried 5089's and Mpsa18's and they both sound the same, great volume and everything just lacking fuzz. I did flub a couple of the values . I used two 220pf's for the 430p spots, and 470ohm in the 390 spots. I had two resistors in series to make 350r at the start and then changed them to 470, the 470 gave a little more bite, but still seriously lacking in the fuzz dept. Any suggestions?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown14 November 2012 at 06:39

      Got it rigged up , must have been a cold solder, .... sounds like a chainsaw now :)

      Delete
  8. mirosol26 February 2013 at 14:45

    http://mirosol.kapsi.fi/varasto/boxes/1stLady.jpg
    This, in to Triangle. Nothing special. Just a double muff.
    +m

    ReplyDelete
  9. Peeps14 April 2013 at 14:03

    A/B'd this build with my original and they are identical. Great job on the layout! Sounds awes into the repeat percussion.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Rascuachex17 August 2013 at 05:00

    Going to build one of these this week. Is it possible to omit the DPDT switch on this layout without affecting the rest of the circuit?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. mirosol17 August 2013 at 07:45

      No. Just omit it and your circuit is verbatim with the original. That switch just adds caps to that 3n9 in the middle of the board. Original value is 3n9.
      +m

      Delete
  11. Unknown18 August 2013 at 14:08

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Clayford15 December 2013 at 05:31

    @IvIark the 470/500 pF thing - EHX was notorious using what they had on hand and/or was close and cheap. A friend mentioned that if you look over the history of changes to the BMP and note all the changes and that the BMP sound essentially stayed the same is a testament to how great the circuit actually is. I agree.

    Also for anyone looking - 500pF is also the "Tall Font Green Russian" version. This is the ONLY difference between most Civil War and Tall Font BMPs. The DPDT tone switch while not original as a great mod. This is getting moved to the top of my queue. Thanks for this!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Eric21 March 2014 at 15:34

    Hey,

    are you sure that 10k resistor is right? Maybe I have a bad one but, it reduces the voltage from 9v to 1.45v at the collector of q1. I switched the trannies just to see if I had them in wrong and got the same voltage off the resistor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IvIark21 March 2014 at 15:46

      Which 10K?

      Delete
    2. Eric21 March 2014 at 15:59

      Line 9 column 3 going from the 9v in to Q4 (not Q1, my mistake). Maybe it's actually the 12 k resistor that's giving me the issue. Crap, sorry. I should read a little more before posting.

      Delete
  14. Eric21 March 2014 at 16:02

    Checked again. Even at the 12k resistor going to the collector of Q1, I'm only getting 1.5v. Is it supposed to read that low. I must have missed something or maybe a bad solder/bridge.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Eric21 March 2014 at 16:04

    Oh, I'm using 2n5089 trannies as well

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IvIark21 March 2014 at 16:10

      Yes the drain resistors are definitely correct, 12K, 12K, 12K and 10K is what is used in the CW muff. 1.5V is much lower that I would expect though which suggests a problem maybe elsewhere which is pulling it down.

      What voltage are you getting along row 9, the supply row? If you're using 2N5089's you have rotated them 180 degrees haven't you?

      Delete
  16. Eric21 March 2014 at 16:22

    I get 9.23v at the supply row, straight across. Pinouts are correct as well. Still getting 1.5v. Odd. I'm looking at the schematic as well and, everything is just as you've laid out. Definitely have an electric vampire in the mix somewhere. Gotta stake that sucker. I'll keep checking. It's gotta be something I missed. Thanks for the help, Mark.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Unknown20 February 2015 at 00:16

    Guys, i seem to have a similar issue as Eric had. I'm getting around 1.5V at my Q2. When i turn the effect on, i hear crackling (like a sparkly type noise). If i crank the sustain to max, and volume, i could hear a bit of guitar come through. Problem is, i resoldered everything again, even changed the resistor that pulls down voltage to the collector of Q2. I'm suspecting a bad component or something so can anyone give me a hint on what component could be bad? Here are my transistor voltages:
    Q1: C = 4.20V, B = 0.75V, E = 0.15V
    Q2: C = 1.60V, B = 0.85V, E = 0.22V
    Q3: C = 4.31V, B = 0.75V, E = 0.16V
    Q4: C = 3.80V, B = 1.56V, E = 0.96V

    Thanks in advance!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Unknown20 February 2015 at 16:17

    Hey guys, my build works and sounds great, though it is always on full gain and rotating the sustain knob doesnt make any difference in Gain. Could that be a bad pot?

    Marko, something similar to your problem happened to me to, when I first engaged the effect there was even with full volume and sustain just barely signal coming through.
    I touched the the copper side of the board a bit and found a spot where the wanted sound came through.

    I fixed the problem in soldering a bridge between the downside lead of the bottom left 430pf cap and the row above on the right side of the cut.
    I dont know why I had to do this, but now it works, except the sustain pot. :)

    cheers

    ReplyDelete
  19. Tommy31 March 2015 at 10:51

    Why in Russian models the diodes are next to transtistors' base instead of collector, as in Triangle and Ram's Head?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Zach31 March 2015 at 18:45

      Actually in both muffs, and all transistor based muffs, in the same exact place. The diodes have 1 leg at the collectors, and 1 leg at the base. If you look on the layout you'll see one leg is on either the base or the collector, while the other leg is connected to another part to the second position near the transistor.

      To make it less confusing. Take a look at the civil war muff above and you'll see the diodes are connected to the base directly, then connected to the collector through the 47nF cap indirectly. Make sense?

      Delete
    2. Tommy4 April 2015 at 01:39

      Yes and no. In Triangle and Ram's the diodes are connected directly to the collector (not the base!), and then to the base trough the cap. It's not the same thing, I think! The cap's position is different!

      Delete
    3. Zach4 April 2015 at 05:08

      you happen to be 100% incorrect. take a look at the schematics posted over at Kitrae, web address below, you can see the schematics for all known dissected big muffs.

      http://www.bigmuffpage.com/Big_Muff_Pi_versions_schematics_part1.html

      ALL big muffs, again with the exception of the IC version are identical in their schematics, just with different part values. in the case of the clipping sections, both the 2nd stage, and 3rd stage the clipping diodes are connected to BOTH base and collector. They are connected in the same arranged and is in parallel with a feedback resistor, and feedback filtering caps, and in series with a clipping/blocking cap.

      take a look at the big muff schematic explained, address below, also from Kitrae.

      http://www.kitrae.net/music/big_muff_guts.html

      Delete
    4. Tommy4 April 2015 at 19:54

      Hm, ok. I've studied these schematics for days. I try to explain what I mean with some graphs.

      In KitRae schematics, components are arranged in this way: in series collector, diodes, clipping cap, base.
      https://www.dropbox.com/s/bi754e8sm2sj48h/cap1.jpg
      So in Triangle/Rams veroboard.
      https://www.dropbox.com/s/pxs1zki6bch01rn/tag1.jpg

      BUT. In Russian veros, components seems to be arranged in that other way: in series base, diodes, clipping cap, collector.
      https://www.dropbox.com/s/svb1qj8s6gqdzo2/tag2.jpg
      This schem would be different (I've photoshopped KitRae schem to explain).
      https://www.dropbox.com/s/j0wl1ad9w41buxo/cap2.jpg

      Maybe it's the same thing if clipping cap is mounted in series between collector and diodes instead of between base and diodes. Maybe not...

      Delete
    5. Zach4 April 2015 at 20:26

      i see what you're going on about now. what you need to remember is that electricity doesn't care about order it passes through the components as long as it travels along the correct path. in each of the muffs what gives it it's difference in tone, distortion/fuzz, smoothness, etc. is down to the selection of components. in the case of the russian muff what makes it more bass oriented and smoother is the size of the coupling caps, and the clipping/blocking caps.

      Delete
  20. Unknown1 June 2015 at 14:35

    If I don't want the Mid Mod switch, which is the right connection? where put I the tone 3 cable? and the sw 1?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Neil18 December 2017 at 20:51

      did you ever figure this out? i'm a bit confused on this one as well..

      Delete
  21. Guitarmageddon14 December 2016 at 01:18

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Guitarmageddon14 December 2016 at 01:19

    Just a comment re the 500pf/430. I happen to have a Civil War on my bench identical to the one pictured above....it has 500pf "feedback" caps- two 1n in series. I'm only saying this to confirm what we all know, they vary! One other interesting thing I noticed is that all the pots measure low, 63, 84, and 76K for V, G and T respectively. I imagine that that volume pot, in particular, might darken this one up a bit?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Sean5 February 2017 at 19:31

    I built a modded version of this just recently and it sounds absolutely crushing! I socketed a couple of the components that are most important to the tone/gain and found the exact values that I like. I also put a switchable LPB-1 in front. VERY satisfying when it was all said and done. This will have a permanent place on my board, I think. \m/

    NOTE, however, that the E B C transistor pinout in the layout above is incorrect for 2N5088, 2N5089, and MPSA18 (at least all of the ones I that I had on hand). When oriented as depicted, you'll get a very "stifled" fuzz -- more like a compressed overdrive. Simply point them in the opposite direction and they'll be aligned properly. As always, verify with the transistor spec for whatever you're using!

    ReplyDelete
  24. oip27 July 2017 at 03:22

    built this and freakin love it, with some value tweaks it nails the muff sound i was looking for and playing through it is so much fun. like the above poster can recommend socketing a bunch of components to taste, and checking the transistor orientation depending what you use.

    also i had to add a low value filtering resistor on the main power line to get rid of some power supply whine.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Unknown19 February 2019 at 03:01

    Thanks for the layout. I did a build video of it.

    https://youtu.be/XDZ0cvqte1Q

    ReplyDelete
  26. Unknown10 January 2021 at 20:01

    Is the 3-position DPDT switch an on/off/on or on/on/on?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shane27 July 2021 at 15:48

      I wanna know this too.

      Delete
    2. Shane27 July 2021 at 18:17

      My guess would be "on/on/on" as 'on/off/on' looks like it would block/bypass the tone control entirely.

      Delete
    3. IvIark27 July 2021 at 18:38

      It's on/off/on. In the outer positions it adds capacitance to the caps already on the board. In the centre position it adds none, hence the 3 different levels.

      Delete
    4. Shane28 July 2021 at 00:52

      Awesome! Thanks so much Mark! Hope you're well. Long time lurker but just now able to get into building and comment. Cheers!

      Delete
  27. Unknown10 February 2022 at 01:16

    I have a weird issue where I have checked all of the solder points and it still just crackles when it is on, if I turn the volume down, it stops due to no volume so the volume is working, but I can't seems to get it to work properly, it probably didn't help that I mirror imaged the board, but I put everything in place, in a mirror image so it should matter that much I wouldn't think. My Voltage seem high? 8.x to the transitors, except in q2 where it is getting 1.51 at C, fluctuation around 4.0 to 4.2 at B, and starting at 4 and dropping to two at E. Oh, the only 47N caps I had are 100 volt ones.
    Any ideas?

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)