Sunday, 15 May 2016

Electro Harmonix Small Stone


101 comments:

  1. Now way.. Get outta here!


    YES!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. this layout is 31x22 and 22 linksa

      Delete
    2. Actually, 23 link - one link in column "S" connects 3 points and so is actually 2 links

      Delete
  2. May God bless your name!

    ReplyDelete
  3. amazing job alex. been waiting for this for a long time. looking at the layout and the schematic i wonder if the color switch could be replaced with a pot to allow for more variation in "color." could probably add depth pot. not to mention adding s witch for univibe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. well it didn't take much digging, but......mods, mods, mods

      https://sites.google.com/site/flofxdiy/eh-small-stone-phase-shifter

      Delete
  4. i boxed four today another wigl vibe, proco rat,vox tonebendef , and a ross compressor with soft latch switching.i want to start this one ha ha.Whats a good sub for the LM324. i have tlo74 tlo64 tle074 and lf347 on hand

    ReplyDelete
  5. from what i can tell the tl064 would be my best sub on hand its low current but probably not as good as the lm324 but should be able to work

    ReplyDelete
  6. which schematic is this based off of?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've used this:
      http://s853.photobucket.com/user/bernardduur/media/Schematics/SmallTone.jpg.html

      Delete
    2. Hey Alex,

      Are we sure this schematic is right? For one thing, it says "small TONE" in the upper left corner and for another it seems that there are differences with other schematics found online... and I couldn't find a schematic that used 3.3nF caps instead of 6.8n... any ideas? Thanks!

      Delete
    3. There are different versions of the Small Stone and Bernard d'Uur schematics are usually very reliable.
      His is based on this version of the pedal:
      http://freestompboxes.org/download/file.php?id=26559&mode=view

      Delete
    4. Ahoy Alex,

      With a quick look, there seem to be parts mmissing from the redrawn schematic around the bottom module of the lm324 (56k, 47nf and 10nf caps etc). I guess some resistor values have been changed in.order to keep ratios right (ie 11k Instead of 10k to match with the 33k instead of the original 30k) but there are also more changes in values. Some electrolytic values are different as well.

      Any ideas? Thanks!

      Delete
    5. The schematic is based on a pedal called Small Tone which is a clone of the Small Stone.
      Could no find any videos of it but I trust the guy that traced it.

      Delete
  7. Does anyone had a look at the first Sovtek Small Stone? This will definetly be on my build list. I had the opportunity to buy the Sovtek Small Stone when it was new, but at the time really needed more a distortion so bought the Green Russian Muff (One that got me really started on the whole stompbox "madness")

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have built this layout and I am getting some distortion but mostly ambulance siren style oscillation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I swapped out the lm324 for other quad opamps and it stopped the siren but the effect became barely audible.

      Delete
    2. I've double checked again and it matches the schematic.
      The only thing missing between this version and the original is a 47R resistor between the transistor's Emitter and Collector.
      Can you try to add it?
      Can you measure your voltages?

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Could you start a thread in the debugging forum with quality pictures? I would be happy to look at it maybe you missed something. I used a 47k at the input instead of the 100k for less volume drop. There are several mods for these on the tonepad site.If Alex double checked im sure you have a bad part or a bridge or a small mistake off by a hole or missed a cut. Alex is as sharp as a razor.I am going to make one but it will be several days before i can. Busy at the day job and have some troubleshooting to do on a couple of my mishaps ha ha.When I do make it ill post working voltages for sure if that will help

      Delete
    5. http://postimg.org/image/kxqmzwurl/
      http://postimg.org/image/6pwcxisox/
      http://postimg.org/image/460q3f54x/
      http://postimg.org/image/4hi6g6lkx/

      Delete
    6. What transistor did you use?
      Have you tried the 47R resistor?
      Can you measure your voltages?

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  9. few things beats a vero of a classic stomp, good job!
    gona build it ASAP and if it doesn't work... it's nobodys fault but mine :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Is there any substitute for BC337?

    ReplyDelete
  11. I built a second one and it is good to go. I will say that it doesn't sound quite as deep as the small stone I own, but not bad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cool! Thanks for verifying it!
      Some Small Stones were built with different ICs and that could make the difference.
      Did you try to add the 47R resistor between Emitter and Collector to see if it makes any difference?

      Delete
    2. i see what looks like at least 3 solder bridges on the back top left row four or five and 6 or seven a few holes from the right. take a knife and cut between every row you have a lot of bridges or near bridges and or resin . i know resin isnt supposed to conduct but several times i cur resin and my pedal worked after. there maybe micro bridges hiding under it . . also found a leg that was poorly soldered bottom inch from the rright second last row on leg is mostly not soldered. canr reallt troubleshoot much more unless you mark the cuts with a red or blue marker. i know it takes a few minutes to mark the top and bottom for cuts but it saves way more time placing parts and troubleshooting. they are food reference points.I drill my holes its just as fast and cleaner cuts. after i drill i use a scotch bright pad and clean away any stuff sticking up . you have some stuff sticking up it looks like .you definitley have some solder bridges knife every row . hit that partially soldered leg with some solder. even if you have built 500 pedals on tagboard marking the top and bottom saves time trouble and headaches.

      wires are good electrolytics look good. i noticed you used 12k for 11k that shouldnt matter to much. might make it less small stoney but should work.

      you should post the voltages for the working and non working one if scoring in between rows doesnt fix it. i wish i could see the cuts better if knifing isnt the fix then recheck the cuts. also saw some solder that might be bridging across a cut longwise in the top left area. i should have written it all down but there were lots of things that looked shaky its hard to tell from a 2d pic. go over it again hit your cuts agiain and knife it. that top left has several bridges it looks like. i just knife the entire board now . it doesnt hurt anything sometimes you get some fray just resolder and it melts. good job on verifying a difficult build on the second attempt.


      does it have the volume drop? if so you can change the 100k inout to a 47k it helps lesson the drop.

      Delete
  12. I've noticed that the older small stones use 6.8nf caps in the phase stages, this one uses 3.3. Try the bigger ones.

    ReplyDelete
  13. wow lots of typos in previous post sorry burning the midnight candle

    ReplyDelete
  14. Very impressed with this Alex. I started this a few times but the way I do layouts always ended up with it becoming too big for a 1590BB ad so I stopped before the end. Nice job matey

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Is there a way to have an LED status light change with the rate? I'd like to build this with a mix level mod, but I'm also in love with the rate LED idea having seen it on the chorus projects.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not sure but try adding a CLR from 13700 pin 16 to LED+ and LED- to ground.

      Delete
    2. LM324, Pin 14 to LED+ does a hard blink.

      Delete
  17. I posted this in the debugging forum and I'd be interested in some expertise:

    As I continue to troubleshoot this, I'm seeing something in the layout that doesn't make any sense as compared to the schematic. Reading left to right and top to bottom, there's a link in column 13 that links rows 17 to 21. Among other things, it links pin 2 of the LM324 to pin 6. However, these two pins are not linked in the schematic (OP1A- and OP1B-):

    http://s853.photobucket.com/user/bernardduur/media/Schematics/SmallTone.jpg.html

    It would seem to me that there is a missing cut in the layout - right above the one in the very bottom row. This would isolate pin 2 from pin 6. Pins 6&7 would be linked and connected to the 1k resistor which goes to the 3u3 cap and out. Pin 2 would then only be connected to the 15k and 18k resistors as in the schematic.

    Can someone take a look and verify? If I'm right, how would anyone have successfully built this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just to close the loop, that cut was added and I verified this layout. Sounds really great! Still not sure what the trimmer does.

      Delete
  18. Finished this pedal today and I also have an ambulance siren emitting from it's output when turned on.
    Glad I checked back on this page before starting to troubleshoot!
    Will add the missing cut tomorrow and report back.

    ReplyDelete
  19. By comparing this schematic

    http://freestompboxes.org/download/file.php?id=26559&mode=view

    to the Small Tone adaptation

    http://s853.photobucket.com/user/bernardduur/media/Schematics/SmallTone.jpg.html

    I can see that there is at least one mistake [R37 in SmallTone is 100R whereas in the first it is noted as 100K (luckily, the prototype uses Ω (omega) to denote Ohms so there is no chance that 100K could be mistook for 100R).

    Moreover, there is a 56K resistor in the negative input (pin 6) of the lm324, a 47nF cap between pins 5 and 7 and a 10nf between pins 6 and 7 of the same chip that are missing.

    There are some other important value changes ie the R40/R41 pair which is 4.7K / 1K in the hand-drawn version and 3.3K / 1.8K in SmallTone but I don't know how they are justified.

    Anybody has more info or explanation for the above? Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  20. this layout is 31x22 and 22 cuts its not 33 long

    ReplyDelete
  21. Ahoy,

    Regarding my previous comments after I tested the values of the two schematics:

    1. The correct value is 100R and not 100K, so the value in the value in the vero is correct

    2. Same holds for the 56K of the original schematic that is replaced with a short here; again this vero is correct

    3. I tried the 47R between E and C of the transistor, it changes the shape of the lfo slightly but noticeably. I omitted it as per this vero since I liked it better.

    4. Strassercaster is right, the dimensions stated in the picture need to be corrected

    5. The first cut at the left of the 82K is not needed, there s nothing at its right (probably a remainder of a previous version)

    6. There is one important mistake though in this vero coming straight from the schematic used : The feedback path is never disconnected regardless of the color switch position. This path should be connected when the color switch is engaged and sent to ground when it's not. You can see this in the hard-written schematic that I posted above which uses a 2pdt switch for this reason. I was wondering why I did not notice such a big change in the sweep of the lfo between the two modes and I was assured when I tried to do the vibrato mod which did not work properly as the wet signal was always fed back in the normal color position. You essentially need to use a 2pdt switch for the colour that additionally controls the connection between the 68K res and the 6n8 cap at the bottom left corner of the vero: middle would be the 6n8 and the other two sides would be either ground when the colour switch is disengaged or the 68k when it is engaged.

    Have fun and again thanks a lot Alex!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Forgot something:

    I ended up using a 47nF cap between pins 5 and 7 and a 10nf between pins 6 and 7 of the lm324, but I did not check if they help with ticking noise.

    I also added a 10nF cap between pins 1 and 2 of the lm324 that reduced the ticking without altering the lfo that match. You might want to experiment with other values for your case, and keep all cables as far as part from the board and between each other as possible to minimize the ticking and check whether a cap between pins 1 and 3 or 2 and 3 helps to this end :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, mate!
      With the added switch part does it sound like the original?
      Has the trimmer any effect on the "Color"?

      Delete
    2. Thank YOU Alex :)

      Yes, it does sound like the way it should mostly (i have a nano xo) since there should be no feedback with the switch disengaged :)

      In lieu of a reverse log pot, I used a B500K - you lose the lowest speeds but you have more resolution in the upper speed range. Still, the slow speeds are slow enough, I d even try to go lower with a linear pot. [Of course using a log pot wired in reverse is NOT equivalent to a reverse log pot since this is a rheostat and you get exactly the same result]

      The trimmer definitely affects the intensity of the effect when the colour switch is engaged but most of the change happens in the first quarter if i recall correctly. I also used a lower stop resistance (the one used here is the 68K, I think I used a 39K) to increase the maximum intensity possible with the trimmer (the lower the resistance, the more intense the effect)

      I also did the univibe mod but used the default univibe values, i liked them better than the typically suggested ones :)

      Let me know how it works out for you :)

      Delete
    3. Ok.
      I'll add a new layout with the second part of the switch and a 39K resistor.
      Had to turn the trimmer and add the switch between the trimmer and the (now 39K) 68K resistor to keep the board of the same size.
      Thanks for the help!

      Delete
    4. Again, we are grateful for your work (and that includes of course Mark, Miro and the rest of the guys), we are just happy to be helpful from time to time in return :)

      The switching comes from this layout :

      http://freestompboxes.org/download/file.php?id=26559&mode=view

      maybe consider putting a note that 68K was lowered in order to give more range in the feedback strength :)

      Thanks again,
      Taki (",)

      Delete
  23. WOW I started three of old layout last weekend they are half done didnt save it . i have a request for version 2 is this till a version 2? i thought i would be ok and that this was verified. any chance of getting the old layout Alex? i will take the time to make the changes. is this a vwrsion 2? version 2 is the only one i know of that uses the lm13700 insted of the ca3080/3094 chips. if not anyine got a version 2 schematic to make the mods i need too. thanks ill restart tonight. i am 189 out of 190 for starts and finishes 189 out of 193 now ha ha oh well

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've sent it via email.
      This is the same version there was before with the switch's corrections.

      Delete
    2. You the man i got it. I went ahead and started two new ones. one for me and my customer. Im too busy to mess with the older layout at the moment ill come back to them eventually . is this new layout verified? I finished mine at 2 am last night ill test when i get home today . I am always a bit nervous on testing mega builds like this ha ha

      Delete
  24. How is the switch wired (from back)?

    1-2
    3-4
    5-6

    or

    1-4
    2-5
    3-6


    thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Thank you.

      But anyway - i also get siren-like sound. Checked everything, cleaned all the traces. Just don't have any other IC's to test them.

      Delete
    3. There is a major issue i mad two have no mistakes i caN find.i did my triple check before firing up . It has a Low pulsing ufo sounding siren.i used audio probe its there on the 1st resistor the 100k. also 9v on bc337 all three legs. issue is at the beginning of the circuit.where is the schematic . my guess is last minute change or something . this cant be verified is it?

      Delete
    4. i assumed the switch is wired like a chip could this be the issue ?top left is 1 bot left is 3 bot right is 4 top right is 6 is this how its supposed to be ? I just saw the full drive it is 1-4 2-5 and 3-6 ill swap them out tonight and see if that does the trick I am sorry i steered you wrong Eugeene

      Delete
    5. I tried switch the other way same results pulsing synth sound . please check this Alex I have to finish it soon . I sold one ha ha i thought it was verified . audio probe issue at input first resistor has to be something simple

      Delete
    6. Found a mistake.
      The 33K resistor next to the trimmer is in the the wrong place. It needs to go between pins 1 & 5 of the LM324.
      Let me know if it works.

      Delete
    7. 1-4
      2-5
      3-6

      for sure verified

      Delete
    8. yes, that 33k resistor thingy was really the issue. Thanks a lot, all of you! :]

      Delete
  25. Bingo its a hit. it was the 33k resistor as you said. Thank you very much. This is considered the version 2 of the series run.I did the ca3080 version from tonepad a couple years ago one of my first. for those wondering i find the phase to have a different feel. it is a bit less prominent. the trimmer has way less affect than i remember.Now i will check out the suggested mods and tinker with them . i have unity volume currently much nicer than the tonepad phaser i spent weeks tinkering with it . i am happy right of the bat with this one.

    one other thing it seems a little noisier o when the color switch is engaged is this normal. I lent my other small stone to a friend in another state ha ha

    ReplyDelete
  26. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No ticks either so far have boxed or cranked my 100w plexi yet though but so far so good

      Delete
  27. THe schematic shows lm13600 i believe . I tried both there seems to be a difference but not much. Ill do a shootout when they are Boxed. Your a life saver Alex Thank you !!!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Nice job, but if I look on other shematic on the web like http://freestompboxes.org/download/file.php?id=26559&mode=view
    and
    http://www.montagar.com/%7Epatj/smlstone.gif
    I see that the color switch shortcut the 470K resistor an the trimpot a th ON position. And connection between 470K and 39K is never broken.
    ON position --> Shortcut the 470K and the Trimpot
    OFF position --> use the 470K and the Trimpot connect the link between 470K and 39K to th ground.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Hi , Has there been any success on this build yet. No one has mentioned about how it sounds!

    ReplyDelete
  30. what're the chances of a getting a layout for a Bad Stone?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alex already did it and posted in the forum

      Delete
  31. Alex, can you post a link to the old schematic? As Sebastian has noted above, I believe there is an issue with the color switch (pins 4,5,6) on the current schematic. I'd like to check against the old schematic and the discussion above to trace out where I've gone wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've managed to get it working, here is what I did based on the most recent vero layout updated on 08/02/2017, referring to the hand-drawn schematic linked by Panagiotis:

      Remove the first cut on the Sw5 row (I bridged it, since I had already drilled it). Move Sw6 down 3 rows.

      Delete
  32. Hi, I was wondering, is there a reason that this layout is still marked as unverified? I put the circuit together using the current layout earlier this evening and it fired up first time, with no apparent issues. It appears to be phasing properly and the colour switch intensifies the effect. The lower I set the trimmer the deeper the phasing sounds with the colour switch on. Is there an issue that I'm missing, or is this thing good to go? I'm just asking now so I don't go though the hassle of boxing it up only to discover an issue later on. 😃

    p.s. Thanks guys for all the work that goes into this site! It may be creating a bit of a guitar effects obsession in me, and making me spend all my pennies on components instead of food and rent, but it's totally worth it! Thanks everyone! 😀

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. the layout is still wrong. needs to be updated to correct the color switch problems.

      Delete
  33. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  34. hello, noob question, can someone explain to me what is this blue dot? i've marked it in this picture.
    http://i.imgur.com/32p1s3J.jpg

    thank you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is a double link hole, basically meaning that the link above and the link below meet in the same hole.

      Delete
    2. thanks for the explanation!

      Delete
  35. Built it. Works fine. Just couple notes to add. The 9V1 zener may be too low, killing the LFO pulse on low settings. Swapped it for 12V and no issues with LFO dying anymore. Also. I'd personally recommend C500K pot for rate. Better control and the slowest setting is still slow enough.

    So there's two working builds (David's and mine). I'd call this verified.
    +m

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mine is working fine as well, built two in one box for stereo :)

      Delete
    2. Should we wait for Alex or should i tag it?
      +m

      Delete
    3. i think we need to wait for alex to tag it. i know i can't edit any of the other admins posts, only my own.

      Delete
    4. Cool guys but it already said "verified".
      At least that's what I see on my screen.

      Delete
    5. ALEX! I was boxing mine and noticed the output cap is in reverse. Please fix the layout once you see this...
      +m

      Delete
    6. Thanks for the 12v zener tip. It also appeared to reduce 'IN' signal clipping.

      Delete
    7. Thanks Miro! I've updated it.

      Delete
  36. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Wow, thank you for this piece of art!!!
    One question, is this the exact layout of the schematics from Bernard D'Uur?

    ReplyDelete
  38. This one work very well again but the rate pot, when turned to the maximal speed isn't so fast, even with the switch engaged. But it's not really a problem, it works ! Thanks again Alex for this one !

    ReplyDelete
  39. Ciao Alex,
    I've built it and he works well with switch in position 3->5 + 4->6, but when I change switch position, it doesn't work and re-changing switch position he still doesn't work.
    I've to turn off the power and turn on with switch in working position to make the effect work.
    Any ideas why this happens?

    ReplyDelete
  40. Hi, all! Does it sounds like a original????

    ReplyDelete
  41. This effect works, but doesnt sound right to me. Its very percussive, choppy and staccato with its phasing cycles. Is that LFO clicking i hear? It sounds more like a slight pause in between its phasing cycles. Ive checked my work multiple times but cant find any mistakes. Any idea what i can do to solve this issue? Thsnks!

    ReplyDelete
  42. hey thanks for making this layout. i built it but it doesnt sound accurate. i debugged it to problems with the way you have implemented the color switch points 4-5-6. looks like the "d'Uur" schem excluded the color switch and it has been added back in incorrectly. i dont have time to do a full writeup, but basically the input 100k should connect to 6, and the trimpot should connect to 5. on my build i replaced the trimpot and the 470k with a 270k resistor as per the original EHX schem, and wired up the switch as per the EHX schem and it is sounding as i remember it when i played a friends a few months ago. also, the 39k hanging off switch pin 5 should be 68k. it would be nice to recheck the layout with the proper EHX one as the "d'Uur" schem has errors. peace

    ReplyDelete
  43. I've built this and its working but only with the color switch engaged, otherwise it just passes the guitar signal straight through with no phase effect. Any ideas?

    ReplyDelete
  44. Hey guys, would 2N3904 be a good replacement for the BC337? I can't seem to find 337s locally. I'd order tayda but I'd have to wait for days to arrive. Will it still work with 3904s cause I can buy a 50 pack for cheap here. I wonder who has tried them as replacement. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I’ve finished this and it sound amazing. Thank you Alex for this wonderful layout! You guys rock! But only concern is I can’t get slower rates. With rate pot at zero the swirling effect is still fast. Should I change the rate pot? To what value? I used B1M btw.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Hi. Can i replace the 13700 with a 13600? Is there a substitute for the bc337?

    ReplyDelete
  47. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Hey fellas. I've been reading the comments and it seems that there were changes to the circuits and I wonder if the current image is verified. Also, where can I see the schematic it is based on? I wait an answer. Greetings and thanks for all your work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The current image is verified! The LED pops when engaging the effect for me on a mechanical 3PDT, so it would be worth implementing a different LED method. I'm also curious about the schematic.

      Delete
  49. If anyone has access to the schematic, that'd be great. The link is dead, and I can't find the "Small Tone" schematic anywhere using the LM324.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Do any of these components need matching?

    ReplyDelete