As some of you may know, I was lucky enough to pick up an original germanium transistor equipped Mosrite Fuzzrite earlier this year. It has without a doubt been my favorite pedal I've ever owned, and I traced the circuit to share with you fine folks.
EDIT: There were some mistakes in my initial trace due to a couple hidden links and an oddity with one cap connection. I have updated the layout, and this is your standard Ge Fuzzrite with component values matching mine, and an added voltage inverter for easy daisy chaining
Welcome Travis.
ReplyDeleteGlad to see the action's back!
Is there a suitable sub for the 350k reverse pot?
ReplyDeleteAs Miro stated in Mark's Ge Fuzzrite post, you can use a C500K pot with a 1M2 resistor between lugs 1 and 3
DeleteBy the way, I just noticed a mistake I must have made when shifting things around on the layout. The cut to the right of Q1 base needs to be moved so that it's between the 2n cap and Q2 collector. I will edit this when I get back from work. Sorry!
Thanks
DeleteCongrats Travis!
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to the new direction of this fantastic blog.
Congrats Travis!
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to the new direction of this fantastic blog.
Holy shite! I made a couple serious errors in my trace as a result of being too careful when I took the pedal apart to trace.
ReplyDeleteI built it up and it wasn't working right, so I tore open my Fuzzrite, and this time I bent everything out of the way and disconnected wires to get a better look.
Well, I missed two links on the board, and totally biffed it up in general. Sorry guys, I feel like a total fool for messing up my first post like this! But I'll post an updated layout so you can at least have a nice Fuzzrite with inverter layout. It is still my favorite fuzz after all.
The most confusing part on my Fuzzrite is the 25uf cap. That really mislead me into thinking it was an emitter bypass cap on Q2, but after finding one more link, I now see this cap seems to be doing nothing at all in my pedal. Both legs are actually connected to ground.
I have no idea why they would do this, unless maybe if the pedal didn't have enough gain maybe they would snip the link that would turn this into an emitter bypass cap on Q2
It's a little strange, and I'm sorry for my confusion! Please hold off on building this until I post an update
Welcome Travis and thanks for your contribution!
ReplyDeleteJust one but very important thing:
Your layouts (uploaded picture files) are not supposed to be called "MGFESbcxjasol25663" and stuff like that.
They are supposed to have a logical name, so that we can find it again after downloading it to our harddrive.
Remember:
Nothing is more annoying than searching trough over 1000 files, just because someone did not name the file properly/logically. Don´t be one of those guys...!!!!
Besides the funky naming of the image file, I find that I can't open the file once I save it. I get a message saying it's corrupted or too large. I've tried this on Windows and Linux with no luck. I didn't have this problem with the original images you posted. I noticed those were .jpg and the new one is .png.
ReplyDeleteAnd regarding the 25uF cap, I think you'll find that it's connected between power and ground. It might measure as 0 ohms with a meter, but that's because it's discharged. Hold the probes there long enough and the cap will start to charge and the resistance will increase.
Please don't take this as a negative comment. I'm really happy to see some activity here again, and I'm sure you'll get the swing of it soon.
One side of the 25uf cap is connected to the emitter of Q2, which is also connected to ground. The other side is connected to the positive (ground) battery lead which is tied back to another ground connection on the switch. So both legs of the cap appear to be grounded.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure why you can't save the image though. I'm uploading the images through the site with a photobucket URL. It's .PNG which works on the site
I would upload the images directly from my computer but I'm having issues logging on the site with my computer.
I tried saving the image again, for the fourth time, and now I'm able to open it. Go figure. Maybe Photobucket went haywire for a while.
DeleteI take it your Fuzzrite is hand built. I bet somebody at the factory screwed up, the negative side of the cap really ought to connect to the negative battery lead, not the positive lead. This cap just filters the power and batteries don't really need filtering, so you probably wouldn't hear any difference even if you connected it correctly. A lot of early stompbox circuits didn't include a filter cap, but they can be noisy when powered by an external supply.
Yes I know. What threw me off is that I missed the link connecting the Q2 emitter to ground, which would have made sense as the cap would then be an emitter bypass cap boosting the gain of Q2. I also made a couple other mistakes which should all be corrected in this update, though it is currently unverified. Sorry for the inconvenience!
ReplyDeleteHi! A Fazz face transistor set it would be usable in this circuit. Which range of Hfe for Q1 and Q2?
ReplyDeleteThanks
Daniele
Typically people will use a higher hfe for Q1 and lower for Q2
ReplyDeleteI thing generally something like 100-150 for Q1 and 40-60 for Q2
Hey Travis! Welcome and thank you!
ReplyDeleteIs the layout updated? I was just thinking of resurrecting my Ge FuzzRITE project last night and you have come through in the clutch!
Thanks bud. This has been updated but not verified
ReplyDeleteBottom right cut (near 22K resistor) is useless i think...
ReplyDelete1 and 8 IC's legs are shorted - is it ok?
ReplyDeleteOops yeah that cut was left there by accident. It won't matter if it's there or not.
ReplyDeletePins 1 and 8 of the IC need to linked
I builded this and it works. Thanks for the scheme! I changed some elements (because a didn't have the right parts): 2 nF caps to 2.2 nF and 40 nF to 47 nF. Also I dont have 2N2613 & 2N408 and I try to use some different - soviet МП42Б with different hFE (~100 & 50), 2N5087 (much more gain) and 2N3906 (much much more gain) - all sound good, but pedal have a very low output level compared to bypassed signal. What can be the reason of this?
ReplyDeleteI forgot something else to say: both pots are 500K.
DeleteThe cap subs are fine
ReplyDeleteSolder a 1M2 resistor across lugs 1 and 3 of the depth pot to turn 500K into ~350K. For the volume pot 500K is fine
The higher resistance of the depth pot may be cutting the output, but this thing should be pretty loud. My Fuzzrite in the picture is wayyyy louder than unity, so there seems to be some problem either with my layout or your build.
Thank you for your help, Travis! It's my mistake. I soldered 5000 Ohm volume pot instead 500K. Now its work very loud and good!
DeleteI there !
ReplyDeleteThanks for this layout !
I wonder if I can replace the Ge transistors, since 2n2616 & 2n408 are really expensive ( something like 20$ on the bay just for 1 )
thanks
as long as they are PNP Ge transistors with in the right gains you'll be fine. travis made the layout based on the Ge fuzzrite he actually owns, which i can tell you from playing through it myself, it sounds particularly amazing. that's not to say other Ge transistors won't sound as good.
DeleteHello Zach
DeleteThanks for your reply !
I saw in earlier response on this thread Travis used PNp Ge with hfe "like 100-150 for Q1 and 40-60 for Q2"
I will try to find them :)
Many thanks !
Believe it or not I haven't even built this thing yet! That was just a suggestion based on the common info online.
ReplyDeleteI thought my pedal had some difference from the main schem that is floating around, but it is totally standard except for the 25uf cap being soldered literally from one ground pad to another making it completely useless
Please repost pics.
ReplyDeletePhotobucket is killing the DIY pedal hobby!!!
ReplyDeleteI personally don't get it why anyone in their right mind would have ever used photobucket for anything. This is quite a mess we're facing right now...
Delete+m
Now that I have switched to Imgur I don't know why I was using Photobucket either. The ads were terrible, but when I first got the account like 10 years ago it wasn't like that
ReplyDeleteAnyway, the reason I haven't updated this is that I seem to have lost this file when I transferred it back in the day. Bear with me please, I'm not really a computer guy and haven't had the time to redo the layouts yet
Finally got the layout files back and updated a couple posts. Apologies for the delay
ReplyDeleteI'm late but really appreciate...
ReplyDeleteIs this Layout good? I have the original transistors and want to try this as my first Build
ReplyDeleteYes! I built it in March and it rips.
DeleteAwesome layout! Built with ECG102 and ECG 158. What's cool about this PNP Germanium Fuzzrite is that is sounds good through the full range of gain and volume. Oddly enough, it has a big, fat, musical sound at some of the lowest gain and lower volume settings. And of course it rips at full gain and volume. Thanks Travis!
ReplyDelete